Imogen Cunningham
Imogen Cunnigham born April 12th, 1883 in Portland, Oregon, US was an American photographer well known for her botanical, nude and industrial landscape photography. She was a well-known member of the F64 club which celebrated the sharp-focus of simple subjects. In 1907, after graduation Cunningham worked for Edward S. Curtis where she learned about portrait and practical photography. She later helped Curtis is documenting American Indian Tribes for the book 'The North American Indian'. In 1915, Imogen got married to Roi Partridge, who posed for a nude shoot for her which was shown by the Seattle Fine Arts Society, however, were criticised. In 1920, Cunningham and her family moved to San Francisco where she started to refine her style of work, discovering her love of botanical photography. Later in the decade, she decided to produce a series of images based on industrial landscapes in Los Angeles and Oakland.
In 1934, Imogen was invited to work in New York for Vanity Fair where she worked for two years until the publication closed down. LAter on in her career, she turned to documenting street photography. She used this as a side project to support her commercial and studio photography. Towards the end of Imogen Cunningham's life she mentored, she met a photographer called Judy Dater who was greatly inspired by her work and continued to work with her until she passed away in 1976.
Imogen had a great memory of the Latin names of plants, and was often in her own garden, tending her plants. When photographing plants, she sometimes placed a simple white or black background behind the plant, even outside in the garden, working with natural light.
Image 1
The image above is of a Datura flower taken in the 1930's. On first appearance this flower looks almost dark and cynical. Where there is a lack of colour and very direct light on the subject it appears very harsh and doesn't have the usual connotations of love and fragility. Instead it appears to hold the feeling of death. I believe this is partly down to the shadows which are extremely evident due to the direct light coming from the right side of the image. These harsh shadows show the lines and curves of the petals much more than soft lighting would therefore taking away the soft and flowing appearance most flower petals have. I like how this images has been taken as the bottom of the flower is also in frame showing a leading line up to the 'main' focus of the flower. This is useful as it adds substance to the image by focusing on the flower as a whole, not just the usual part.
Image 2
The images above is titled Agave Design 2 taken in the 1920's. It is part of a series of images that show different perspectives of the Agave plant, however this one stood out to me the most. The main aspect of this photograph that stands out to me is the abstract nature of it. It does not appear to be of a plant, instead it just looks like a pattern as we don't tend to focus this closely on a plant therefore don't see it this way with the human eye. I think this is powerful in botanic photography as it changes our usual view of nature by showing an intricate detailed pattern. The technical aspects of the photograph such as the texture, detail and shadow that has been photographed within this small section of the plant really makes the image go up a level. Within this simple design we can see the detailed curved edges of the leaves and how the light hits it and casts shadows within the gaps of the leaves. Without this detail the photograph would be just ordinary and shows a pattern rather than a 3D object.
Image 3
This image is of an Amaryllis Flower taken in 1933. I chose this image as one of my favourite pieces from Imogen Cunningham as it stands out amongst the rest of the body of work. It does this because it has a bright white background instead of the usual dark one that majority of the time she shoots against. This image is very simple, there isn't an extraordinary amount of detail or intricacy but I think that it what makes the photograph so interesting. If is had too many leaves or buds it would over complicate the contrast that has been achieved between the black and white photo. I like the composition of the image as the bottom third holds most of the detail with it hang the leaves on the flower. The top however has a leading line in the form of a budding stalk occupying it. This difference in simplicity and shape between the two halves is what makes the image interesting. To me the photograph signifies growth, the bud is ready to sprout, it appears to be standing strong and reaching as high as it can go. It is ready to flower and become something beautiful, giving this photograph a story even after it is taken.
Image 4
This photograph is of a Calla Lilly taken around 1929. When first looking at this photograph I thought it had a gentle appearance. The light colour of it, the shape it forms all seems very feminine and fragile. I believe it connotes love and care, this flower signifies something you would give to someone you love due to its beautiful appearance. It shows care through the gentle nature it holds from its delicate shape with soft shadows and no harsh lines. The curved line that runs through the flower makes your eyes follow it into the centre in one smooth motion, this can represent a calm feeling. The flow of the line means there are no breaks in the main subject that cause your eyes to jar, instead it is taken in continuously through one motion. I believe this photograph shows the more aesthetically pleasing side to botanical photography whilst also keeping the realistic side too as it has been taken in exactly the same manner as the others have.
Image 5
The photograph above is titled 'Hens and Chickens' and was taken in 1930. I can see how the title of this image links to the appearance of it very well as it looks like there are bigger flowers being the 'hens' and smaller flowers being the 'chickens'. The way the bigger flowers have grown is so that they consume the smaller ones almost like that are protecting them showing the 'hen and chicken' relationship. This photograph is different to the other ones that I have selected from Imogen Cunningham's work as it appears to be the only one that wasn't taken in the studio in directed light. Instead it looks like it has been taken in a naturals environment, indicated by the rock and user natural light due to the diffused light that covers the flowers with no harsh shadows. Rather that the dark shadows that the directed studio light produces. This photograph has more detail than most as there are small parts of the wider environment peeping into the outside edges. I prefer this style in my own work as it is more realistic for me to go out and look for plants in their natural environment and photograph the rather than taking them to a studio.
Influence
Above is my image compared to Imogen Cunningham's. I researched Imogen early on in my project when I was trying to photograph different aspects of nature, her work being quite close-up and looked at the texture and form of plants. This intrigued me so I tried her style for myself as shown above. I tried to achieve the shadows and detail that Cunningham had in her work which I think I done however not in the effortless and smooth nature that she did. I liked the closeness of the image which really mirrored all of her work, with concentration on the shape of the plant which makes the image look tranquil, especially with the curves in the centre. This is similar to what Imogen Cunningham demonstrated.
Summary
In conclusion, I was intrigued by the work of Imogen Cunningham and how simple it appeared. All of her work was aesthetically pleasing, with beautiful and soft shapes and textures running throughout. Therefore I tried her work but I realised that I couldn't achieve what she has due to my lack of access to the plants and the settings that she took them in. I tried her style for this shoot and although I liked the outcome I wasn't sure where else to go with it. Consequently, I didn't carry on this style on it's own, instead I tried to include close-up's of nature within other shoots to bring concentration a little closer, giving an original feeling to my work.































